A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst potential neighbours over the construction of a wall in a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to make their relatives property. The situation has become emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, in which views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the website, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture that has considering that come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute while in the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple simply just wanting to establish a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. Nevertheless the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.